This error was found during this (http://nocturnal-media.com/forum/index.php?topic=1605.0) thread.


p174, the end of the entry for Great Sword reads:


On a fumble, the great sword is dropped but not broken,
and can be recovered. On a tied resolution roll, the great sword
breaks the opponent’s weapon unless it is a great sword as well.


The italicised text should be '...unless it is a sword or a great sword as well.'

Regards
Luke

Oh FFS. it is impossible to try and keep up even as a fairly keen pendragon player who quite likes forums. God help anyone coming in afresh.

the errata page linked to on the Errata thread http://www.gspendragon.com/pendragon_errata.html has no mention of this.

That one little twiddle, which has Huge ramifications, is quietly mentioned in passing in one obscure thread.

"What would you like to see in a KING ARTHUR PENDRAGON Sixth Edition? "
just a proofread well indexed fifth edition reprinted with all the errata added in.

Oh FFS. it is impossible to try and keep up even as a fairly keen pendragon player who quite likes forums. God help anyone coming in afresh.

That's a valid point, Dan. That's why we're keen on the possibility of a PENDRGON 6th Ed.


"What would you like to see in a KING ARTHUR PENDRAGON Sixth Edition? "
just a proofread well indexed fifth edition reprinted with all the errata added in.


Such errata are not so much the result of a lack or proofreading (although there is some of that), but of the game evolving over the past ten years since KAP 5th Ed. was released. Yep. TEN YEARS. Yeow! A lot of games in this same age-category has already hit 7 editions.

I think we can do a little better than just an indexed 5th with some errata thrown in. Stay tuned...


T.

I think we can do a little better than just an indexed 5th with some errata thrown in. Stay tuned...


Now, that is outright Cruel. Let us know, in the name of King Arthur!