View Full Version : The Great Pendragon Campaign web enhancement?
Derek van Kenau
04-16-2010, 07:22 PM
Hi everybody.
Excuse me if this has been dealt with before, but I am new here:
I seem to recall that there's a mention in The Great Pendragon Campaign
about a web enhancement for a portion of the book. I've tried searching
for it high and low, but to no avail. Is this something I've misunderstood?
I understand if it is eradicated from White Wolf's/Arthaus' page, so in case
anyone has it, could they please make it somehow possible to copy?
Thankful for all answers.
Sir Pramalot
04-16-2010, 07:49 PM
Hello and welcome.
I think you're probably referring to the Pendragon Gamemaster Character's supplement. It lists the main NPCs from the book and presents each of them in far greater detail - full Trait & Passion scores for example.
You can get it here (http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/product_info.php?products_id=15749&it=1)
Derek van Kenau
04-16-2010, 09:15 PM
Hello and welcome.
I think you're probably referring to the Pendragon Gamemaster Character's supplement. It lists the main NPCs in the book and presents each of them in far greater detail - full Trait & Passion scores for example.
You can get it here (http://rpg.drivethrustuff.com/product_info.php?products_id=15749&it=1)
Thanks very much! It'll be interesting to see just how great the details are on the magnificent characters of the story!
I'm d/l-ing it as I write this. The amount of money I put on buying the OOP TGPC is by far the most money I've laid on
any supplement anywhere, so this'll come in handy. Thanks again!
Mazza
04-19-2010, 01:34 PM
I've noticed in the web supplement that Madoc's age is given as 33 at 485 - but Uther is only "nearly 40" himself. I am assuming this is a typo and Madoc is more like 23 in 485 than 33 - does anybody know if there are any official errata for this supplement?
DarrenHill
04-19-2010, 02:08 PM
I don't think there's official errata for that supplement, but making him 23 seems like a good idea.
Thorsen
04-29-2010, 07:00 PM
Uther is only "nearly 40" in 485.
Interesting!
After all, his father was killed in 440 - 45 years ealier :P
merlyn
04-29-2010, 11:50 PM
I think that it's difficult to set up a completely consistent timeline for the Arthurian legend, with so many different interpretations. (Two examples, both from "The Great Pendragon Campaign" - on its timeline, Lancelot, usually depicted as a baby when the Lady of the Lake takes him away after the fall of Benwick and death of King Ban, is ten years old in the GPC version, and the story of Tristram begging for his stepmother's life is labeled "A Child's Mercy", though the event takes place in the GPC in 522 and Tristram is born in 501, making him 21 at the time - certainly not a child.)
doorknobdeity
04-30-2010, 01:06 AM
Tristram is born in 501, making him 21 at the time - certainly not a child.
Looks like someone hasn't had to clean up after a drunk college student lately.
doorknobdeity
05-04-2010, 03:17 AM
Some other hiccups: Guinevere is 17 in 510, despite being born in 487; the only Chivalric knight before the advent of Arthur is Saexwulf, the Saxon Aetheling; King Lot is a total weenie, with only 7 STR and 3d6 damage; Sir Lancelot seems to have a lazy eye that never really gets better.
DarrenHill
05-04-2010, 03:33 AM
Lazy eye? really?
That's the one pendragon supplement I don't have.
doorknobdeity
05-04-2010, 03:35 AM
Really, lazy eye. It's most noticeable in his earliest portrait, but the man simply cannot get his eyes pointing in the same direction.
DarrenHill
05-04-2010, 03:38 AM
Ah I see, hehe
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2018 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.